If you’re a founder who goes quiet whenever someone says “just reach out to your network,” this one is mine.
In July I set myself a target: contact two qualified prospects a week. It was a reasonable number. I wrote it down properly, in a decision record, with a review date.
Four months on, the count is zero. Not low. Zero.
The product has been ready since April.
It was not discipline
That was my first explanation, and it survived about a minute of checking. Over the same stretch I published thirty-one posts, built four internal tools, and closed more than two hundred working sessions. Whatever was stopping this, it wasn’t an inability to do difficult things on a schedule.
What stopped it was simpler and more embarrassing. The target said to contact two qualified people a week, sourced from my network.
I don’t have one.
The thing that hid it
“Reach out to your network” is such standard advice that writing it down feels like progress. It reads as a step. It has a verb in it.
And it survives review because nobody reviewing a plan asks the boring question: does the thing this step draws on actually exist?
I checked whether the target was realistic. I never checked whether the input was real.
So the gate sat there for four months producing a weekly zero, and every one of those zeroes read as a personal failure rather than evidence about the plan.
Where it stops being fatal
Here is the part that changed my week, and it turns on one distinction.
If the people you need are specific individuals, having no network is close to fatal, and the fix is measured in years. You cannot conjure relationships, and anybody who tells you to “just build your network” is describing an outcome, not a method.
If the people you need are a role, it is not fatal at all.
Roles are public. People whose living depends on being hired are findable by job title, and they have made themselves findable on purpose. You are not asking to be let into a circle. You are reading a directory that already exists, that anyone can open, and that is kept current by the people in it because being missed costs them money.
So the question underneath “how do I build a network?” turns out to be a different one: can I describe who I need by what they do, rather than by who they are?
If yes, the network problem may be a search problem wearing a heavier coat.
What I’d do differently
Write the plan, then go back through it and mark every step that draws on something you have not verified you possess.
A network. An audience. A skill. A list. A tool you’ve never opened.
Those are the steps that will quietly not happen. And when they don’t, they won’t look like a flaw in the plan. They’ll look like a personal failing, week after week, which is the most expensive way to be wrong about a plan.
Mine took four months to catch, and only because I said the sentence out loud to somebody who asked what the list was.
I don’t have a network. I’m going to need one eventually.
But I can describe the person I need by their job title.
For now, that’s enough to start on a Tuesday.
Want more like this? Rick writes about the go/no-go decision, founder counterintuitions, and the business of building ventures worth building.
All writing